Propeller. Fail. »
Posted by: DiffeeOnline 1 month ago268 Comments Report this Story
The reviews are starting to roll in. There are only two possible conclusions so far: either the community will need some time to get used to the new changes over at Propeller, or the changes were a bad move. The initial feelings of the community can best be described when you look at the current (as of 12am PST 7-23-08) top front page story. Here is a screenshot:
Read Full Story at socialnewswatch.com
Join the Discussion 
+ Add Comment
Comments So Far: 268
-

DiffeeOnline1 month ago
I personally think it's going to be okay, but I have some exploring to do. Still, this is funny.
Reply-

djn3nunez31 month ago
-

AlfredKo1 month ago
OH MAN, I am totally disappointed with Propeller.
I understand that much effort is made for improving the site, but this actually is the worst thing that they have ever done!
I am BEGGING the AOL team to revert Propeller back to it's original state.
WHY?
1. Members' Benefits
It's very clear, the majority of the users hate it. Propeller is going to a significant amount of its current members if this continues on - including me.2. Search Engine Friendliness
I considered myself experienced in SEO (search engine optimization).
And the new Propeller are NOT search engine friendly at all.
Propeller will lose much traffic from Google and Yahoo, I am 210% sure about this.
Propeller doesn't stand a chance against Digg if this carries on. The previous ones are much more user-friendly compared to Digg.I can predict 2 things will happen if Propeller decides to carry on with it's current state:
1. At least 50% active users will leave and become inactive.
2. A lot of TRAFFIC LOST from Google, Yahoo.The outcome: Propeller Alexa ranking will drop from 863 to 10,000.
Reply-

questionseverything1 month ago
i have long had a theory that the "powers that be" hate it when we communicate,debate openly
this propellor change stifles debate
does anyone have a forum to suggest that is still free?
Reply
-
-

capecoralM1 month ago
-

questionseverything1 month ago
3) Cannot do a trackback to continue an exchange
4) Unable to track my participation and respond backi have a feeling that was the whole point
Reply
-
-
wtaggComment removed: Spam
-

nightcrawlerX1 month ago
Im still trying to figure whole thing out. I find it rather confusing and I had just gotten used to the old format. It kinda feels like I'm the person who had just finished cleaning up a big mess and all of a sudden drunken coke fueled monkeys are released in the room with a pile of mud.
Reply-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.
-
-

Dionys1 month ago
-

DropkickaLib1 month ago
-
-
baddad59Comment removed: User banned.
-
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.
-

Dicax_Maximus1 month ago
OK, I give up.... I may come back when they make this pile of crap work......
Unlikely, as I have very little patience for eeejits...
This "new site" is FUBAR........
I tried, even created a "group", attempted to do things, SOD IT, I've had enough of wasting my time...
I'm off to trustserve.net At least that site works !!!!
Reply
-
-

Shadowolf1 month ago
-
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.2 Replies
-
-

jtpincubus1 month ago
-

hyperbola1 month ago
The "new" propeller represents a massive failure to understand why the majority of propeller users participated in the site. We were NEVER very interested in the "front page", but rather in the active back and forth discussion and comments. One could learn a lot from those debates.
The "new" design massively degrades capability and user friendliness for participation in active commentary.
POOR visual design: too much white space; much more scrolling, clicking and paging (often very slowly) required to see the same information; nested commentary threads where a majority of comments cannot be seen without endless clicking, .....
POOR choice of categories. The most popular ones have disappeared and/or been fragmented into numerous user groups, where the fragmentation is likely to make them become much less active than previously (the stellar example is politics).
ELIMINATION of some of the most useful tools. For example, elimination of "recent comments" from user pages. These were essential for discussions extended over multiple online sessions and a crucial tool (usihg recent comments of friends) for finding where the interesting discussions were happening.
etc, etc.
Propeller will not survive by showcasing 10 "interesting" (or not) front page stories and has just alienated a large part of its active user base by massively crippling the capabilities for back and forth commentary and discussion.
Reply
-
-

Formidable1 month ago
Hmac, you are on to something. Why are any threads discussing the change being removed.? Propeller overlooked the fact that its' member base drives revenue. Looks like screw the customer to me. I have found the Trustserve site to be a lot of fun without the micromanagement. You are not censored there.
Reply -

AntiNeoCon1 month ago
-

Formidable1 month ago
Hmac, you are on to something. Why are any threads discussing the change being removed.? Propeller overlooked the fact that its' member base drives revenue. Looks like screw the customer to me. I have found the Trustserve site to be a lot of fun without the micromanagement. You are not censored there.
Reply-

AntiNeoCon1 month ago
-
-

lvrofwolves1 month ago
The ONLY thing that even comes close to liking about this is, you can see peoples avatars better, of course I can't upload mine.......I really really really don't like this one bit.
Reply
-
-

canadianrancher571 month ago
I was busy yesterday and wasn't on the internet, but this comes as a real surprise and I have noticed that some of the negative stories have dissappeared. I was trying to read comments and when it prompted me for the next 25 I could not get any more comments. I was on propeller for the exchange of ideas and opinions which meant I liked to read all comments. After trying to navigate my way around this here this morning I have a feeling that someone has shot a hole in the bottom of the boat ,so to speak.
Reply -

Mdiar1 month ago
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.2 Replies
-
-

canadianrancher571 month ago
-

1basque11 month ago
The look is so generic. They took away the personality that propeller once had. It is a pain to work your way through trying to find stories that your friends have submitted and any message that you send to a friend is public .
Reply
I hate to complain , but when you make things harder for people to understand they tend to go look for something that is easier for them. -
AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.1 Reply
-

Mdiar1 month ago
-
AlphaGnosisComment removed: User banned.1 Reply
-
-

canadianrancher571 month ago
Who ever thought up these changes must have never read many of the comments posted by the members of propeller, the comments of we the people . What I noticed from both the right and left was the concern about how we the people felt on issues. In most cases it was through our comments that we tried to arrive a the truth and although sometimes the debates were heated usually sanity prevailed,. right now I feel that our community has been invaded and all my rights are gone.
Reply -

gamahuche1 month ago
Well said, CR!
Reply
I just waded through all 34 pages of "new" propeller. Waded - I mean in thigh-boots, through the slop..
There was virtually NOTHING there apart from floating garbage. A LOT of the kind of stories that I never liked seeing on the front page of the REAL propeller - lots of sock-puppet votes, no content - and a lot of absolute total crap. And everyone of these stories had a rating of 9.6 or higher.. Out of what, a million?? Hardly a comment between them after page 6 or so.l
(Meanwhile a few poor friends are trying to continue as "normal" and have posted some good stories..and they barely show through this sludge and filth that surrounds them}.
Maybe a dozen - at MOST - stories that might have been interesting but multiple repetitions and many stories that shouldn't have emanated from any orifice, even a posterior one. And virtually NO comments.. maybe it just wasn't working??
I tried to post to one poor fellow, damnedviper's second attempt today - the first had apparently abused the TOU by criticising "new propeller" and been removed.. and failed to post, despite trying half a dozen times.
This all takes me back to the days when this was first being discussed and after some initial trepidation amongst many members on one thread, there was a second thread when we were promised that indeed an incredible amount of thought and effort and planning were going on and we would undoubtedly be delighted with the results - and that our concerns and opinions were being taken notice of.. It was used as a carrot during the worst technical failure period.. Just wait and see what's in store for you!!
I believed it!
And now we've REALLY been taken for a ride.
Like getting abused by a hohoho Father Christmas!
And the very WORST thing?
As far as I can see we've actually LOST access to OUR friends - the people that we individually chose to have little back-room discussions with or to share some personal part of our lives with. With no warning we can't access them unless we were close enough or careful enough to also get an e-mail address for them..
AAAARRRGGH!-

amazed1 month ago
I am also upset by the loos of access to friends, the duplicate and triplicate posting, absolutely NO improvement in loading times and, what I miss most -- the My Participation Link. I have had discussions that have continued for days as we go back and see if anyone else commented the next day, if they did you answer, and then they answer and so forth.
Oh well, I guess it will make my husband happy -- there's really no reason to bring the laptop to bed, anymore.
Reply -
TLovesTeddyComment removed: User banned.
-

Mdiar1 month ago
-
-

fsev411 month ago
-
-
ranchhandComment removed: User banned.
-
-
-

alakazam1 month ago
type your comment hereYeah I noticed the Forum Nazi's were out in full force over the issue.
Apparently all dissent must be crushed.
This IS identical to the NGE fiasco at Sony.
If this kind of censorship is what they have planned I will have no further use for Propeller, AOL nor any of their affiliates.
Reply-

aniokly1 month ago
-

UnusualSuspect1 month ago
Well, I'm older, and I don't mind change at all, but I do feel this new facelift wasn't very well thought out.
I'm a modernist, but on the web I think simplicity works best. I didn't like the pedestrian design before, but it was certainly easier to get around the site....much more so than this...
Reply
-
-
-
-

Skeptic1 month ago
From my standpoint, there is only one conclusion - the changes were a bad move.
They sucked yesterday, they suck today and I am willing to bet that they will suck tomorrow!
Reply -
-

ChrisLang1 month ago
You pay for things in some form or another, in our case yesterday it was our time wasted seeing error messages and being unable to submit articles that we all would have liked to have seen.
Also, any documentation on the bookmarklet? Is it going to work again soon?
Reply -

bonaroo1 month ago
This is my second attempt to make a comment. Yesterday I tried to post and the server was down.
I'm not inclined to complain too much. It's not like I'm paying for it. Adapting to change is a quality I cultivate as much as possible these days.
Reply
Submitted By:
DiffeeOnlineSocial media, politics, technology, news, marketing, and the environment. These are my passions. These are the things that I spend more time with than anything ...
Also submitted:
- 6.1 - Arctic Breakup Growing Each Week
- 3.7 - Pelosi says case needed for U.S. offshore drilling
- 5.0 - Firefox 3 Highlights Websites Security Failings
- 3.8 - Bloomberg proposes windmills for New York City
Related Articles:
- 5.0 - Revolt? Day 2, Another Fail Dominates Front Page
- 10.0 - Propeller Gets a Major Overhaul, But is It All Good?
- 1.0 - del.icio.us 2.0 announced as Digg deal eats dirt for ...
- 1.0 - Medicine news
- 1.0 - Top dishonors in writing go to Washington man
Also Propping This Article
tdrapeau
pdedecker
MidnightPrism
Debbie
Helixbuilder
ciera-marie
Ratskii
ameliog
stephen-johnson
Eagle_Eye




